Thursday, February 10, 2011

Papillon, Henri Charrière

If I had only one stroke to define Papillon, central character and at the same time author of this fascinating and entertaining autobiographical novel (in real life Papillon is the alias for Henri Charrière), I would definitely say that he is a person of an unwavering determination of purpose, which is to escape from the prison to which he has been sentenced for life. In fact, not a day passes in the thirteen years of captivity in which Papillon has not his mind set in contriving and getting ready for his next flight, always envisaging high risk plans, always bringing in the adventure those he considers his allies in suffering and always thinking that this will be the ultimate escape to freedom ... and revenge.

The year is 1931 and before a Paris court is brought Papillon, an urchin twenty-five years old, accused of killing an insignificant character of the Parisian underworld and police informer. Papillon asserts his innocence and the evidence against him is weak so he expects to be exonerated. However, he is face to face with the most ruthless public prosecutor imaginable who claims for himself the mission to avenge society of crime in the flesh of disreputable personages as Papillon, with no concern to whether he is guilty or not of the circumstantial accusation, especially if this is so grave that allows his putting away forever. Pradel is the man and in his first speech to the jury intimidates everyone with a threat to Papillon’s face, telling him: "Prisoner at the bar, just you keep quiet and above all don’t you attempt to defend yourself. I’ll send you down the drain alright."

Predictably Papillon gets life and is sent to serve his sentence in the infamous penal colonies of French Guiana on the northern coast of South America. The reminiscence of Victor Hugo's Inspector Javert is inescapable and along with Alfred Dreyfus, artfully accused by his colleagues in arms of treason to France on false charges and whose real and famous case is revisited in the book, give ground to our thinking that there was a long period in which the French courts used questionable methods for dispensing justice and brutally cruel sentences.